Which one of the following best illustrates a situation most likely to reduce extreme poverty?

Providing free education for children of the poorest families, including covering costs for school lunches, is a powerful strategy for reducing extreme poverty. Education is a fundamental tool for breaking the cycle of poverty. By ensuring that children can attend school without financial burdens, they gain essential knowledge and skills that can lead to better job opportunities in the future. This not only helps lift families out of poverty but can also foster long-term economic growth within communities.

Moreover, access to education contributes to a more informed and capable workforce, which is crucial for sustainable economic development. Free schooling can also lead to higher educational attainment and better health outcomes, which further reduces the likelihood of being trapped in poverty. In addition, when children receive adequate nutrition in the form of school lunches, it supports their physical and cognitive development, enhancing their ability to learn and succeed academically.

In contrast, the other options may have benefits, but they do not address the root causes of poverty as directly or effectively as providing free education. For example, while providing jobs on farms could temporarily improve food security, it might not lead to long-term economic stability for families. Tax incentives for banks could increase home ownership, but this approach does not necessarily improve the economic situation of those currently in extreme poverty. Encouraging farmers to