What is one argument made by opponents of constructing new nuclear power plants?

One of the central arguments made by opponents of constructing new nuclear power plants relates to the significant concerns surrounding the disposal of nuclear waste and the risks associated with potential terrorist attacks.

Nuclear waste presents a long-term environmental challenge because it remains hazardous for thousands of years and requires secure, stable storage solutions to prevent contamination of the environment and harm to human populations. Current methods of storing nuclear waste are not without risk, and many argue that the solutions in place are insufficient to ensure safety over such extended time periods. This concern is compounded by the knowledge that leaks or accidents can have catastrophic consequences for local ecosystems and human health.

Moreover, the threat of terrorism exacerbates the situation; nuclear facilities can become potential targets, raising fears about the implications of a successful attack on a nuclear plant or materials used in nuclear energy production. This dual concern—of safe waste disposal and vulnerability to terrorism—creates a compelling argument for many who oppose the expansion of nuclear power, as they believe it poses unacceptable risks to public safety and environmental integrity.